THE TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL

GENESIS RELOADED

PART FOUR: THE TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL

If we desire to gain a deeper understanding of God’s Word, then it is critical that we a) study to show ourselves approved (II Timothy 2:15), and b) follow God’s commands (Psalm 111:10). One of God’s more important commands is to compare spiritual things with spiritual (I Corinthians 2:13). How do we do this? First of all, it is vital that we own a good concordance, such as a Strong’s, or a Young’s. I also highly recommend the two-volume Englishman’s Concordance set, not to mention an e-sword. For example, if you have an e-sword, and want to find out how the words “naked” and “nakedness” are used in the Scriptures, you simply log these words into the search engine and every single verse in the Bible that contains these words will come up. Then you just go down the list and find all of the passages that deal with this idea of man’s nakedness before God. This is how I was able to determine in the previous section that to be naked before God was not necessarily a good thing. By studying in this manner, God’s Word will really open up to you in a way that perhaps you never before thought possible. Try it and see!

Now when we think of this “tree of the knowledge of good and evil,” most of us have this image etched in our minds of a lush garden paradise, with a beautiful fruit-bearing tree planted in its midst. We also have this image of a serpent (or snake) coiled around one of its branches, tempting Eve to partake of its fruit. Many have been led to believe that this “fruit” was an apple, even though the Scriptures do not verify this. But this is the image that many of us have had since childhood. And it is quite natural to take the symbols literally: i.e. a literal garden, a literal tree, a literal snake, a literal piece of fruit, etc. After all, the Scriptures declare that first comes the natural, then the spiritual (I Corinthians 15:46). In other words, we will first come to understand the Bible in a literal (or natural) sense. But if our faith is grounded upon the sure Rock of Truth, which is Christ, then the Spirit will begin to reveal to us the deeper things. The problem with the church, not surprisingly, is that its members seldom mature beyond a superficial understanding of God’s Word (see I Corinthians 13:11; Hebrews 6:1-3). Why? Because nearly all organized religious institutions have their foundations built upon the sand, and not upon the Rock. And a having a sure foundation is essential before we can press on to maturity.

A few years ago, the Genesis story was retold in the science fiction movie classic The Matrix. In it, the main character Neo (Keanu Reeves) is offered a choice between two pills, a blue one and a red one. If he chooses to take the blue pill, then he will remain ignorant of truth (age of innocence). However, if he chooses to take the red pill, then his eyes will be opened to truth (tree of knowledge). Of course he chooses to take the red pill and has an awakening, a rebirth experience. He then notices that his eyes are burning, and asks why. The answer given by the character Morpheus (Lawrence Fishburn) is because he has never used them (his new spiritual eyes) before. So when his eyes finally are opened, and he sees the world as it really is, the truth is more than he can bear. He immediately goes into denial, and wants to go back to a time and place of ignorance (after all, ignorance is bliss). In other words, he tries cover up the truth by denying it, and wants to undo what has been done. Notice any similarities between this story and the Genesis account?

    “Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves coverings.” (Genesis 3:7)

Remember how growing up as a child used to be? Life was fun and carefree. We all lived in our own little fantasy worlds, filled with roadrunner cartoons, where the coyote character falls off cliffs and has 2 ton boulders smashing down on top of him. But the wily coyote never dies, never gets discouraged, and always returns with a greater resolve to succeed the next time. But then grandpa suddenly dies, and we attend our first funeral, where we experience the REALITY of death. And though grandpa smoked, drank, and cursed his entire life, never professed faith in Christ, and barely ever set foot in a church, our parents assure us that he is now in heaven with God. And why do they tell us this? Because they know that the mind of a child is not yet mature enough to bear the “truth” (Christianity’s truth), that he is now burning in hell. In fact, deep down inside, I seriously doubt that there are many Christians who really believe it:

    “Any system of religion that has anything in it that shocks the mind of a child cannot be a true system.” – Thomas Paine (1737–1809)

So as we mature and gain knowledge, we become increasingly aware of our own mortality, and come to understand that this life really is but a vapor, and that we all have an inescapable appointment with death. And there is absolutely nothing that any of us can do to change it.

    “For my soul is full of troubles: and my life draws nigh unto the grave (Psalm 88:3)

So we take refuge in various systems of religious belief, hiding from the truth. For the Hindu, life and death is a progression toward oneness with God through many cycles of reincarnation. John Edwards’ disciples believe they will “cross over” to the spirit world, while Christians are assured that their faith in Christ earns them instant access into heaven. In all three cases, it is only the body that dies; the soul does not. Satan does indeed assure us (through our own minds) that we “shall not surely die.” God’s Word, however, declares differently: “The soul that sins SHALL die” (Ezekiel 18:20).

So what have I just described for you? This is the fall of man story in a nutshell. And this story is much more than just a one-time event that occurred approximately 6,000 years ago. This story is continuously being played out in the daily lives of each and every one of us! For example, I just heard Dr. D. James Kennedy announce to the world during his Easter Sunday sermon that he would never die! And how does he verify this for his audience? By quoting a poorly translated verse of Scripture:

    “Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.” (John 8:51)

If you do not have an e-sword program, then get one – it’s a free download. If you do have an e-sword, then please go to this verse. After the word “never” you will notice three little numbers: 3364, 1519, and 165. These are Strong’s Concordance Greek words. The first word (3364) denotes a negative: not, not at all, never, etc. The second one (1519) is a primary preposition showing motion towards: in, into. The third one (165) is that word aion, which properly translated, of course, means “pertaining to the age, or age-during.” So how should this verse read when properly translated?

    “Verily, verily, I say to you, If any one may keep my word, death he may not see – to the age.” (Young’s Literal Translation)
    “Verily, verily, I am saying to you, If ever anyone should be keeping My word, he should under no circumstances be beholding death for the eon.” (Concordant Literal New Testament)

When this verse is properly translated, an entirely different meaning becomes clear. It is true that Jesus came so that we might have life, and have it more abundantly. But the abundant life Jesus speaks of is the narrow pathway, the first resurrection, which leads to life for the faithful follower during the coming earthly messianic kingdom AGE. This is consistent with the message of repentance that both Jesus and John the Baptist proclaimed while they were here. The “death” Jesus warns of is the “second death,” which takes place at the time of the second resurrection. Jesus did not teach His disciples that they would never die, for even Jesus had to DIE! Do you really believe that you are above your Master? But the multitudes always opt for messages that tickle their itching ears (Isaiah 30:10; II Timothy 4:3,4) rather than for truth:

    “The public will believe anything, so long as it is not founded on truth.” –   Edith Sitwell (1887 – 1964) British poet, critic
    “Truth is often hard to swallow, so we rest in comfortable lies and delusions.”
    – Dorothy Anne Seese, Freelance political writer

Satan is alive and well on planet earth. The Genesis story lives on. The multitudes will always opt for the lie: “Ye shall NOT surely die!” And if you show them the Scriptural evidence to the contrary, they will more than likely still deny it. Why?

    “Many people today don’t want honest answers insofar as honest means unpleasant or disturbing. They want a soft answer that turneth away anxiety.” – Louis Kronenberger, Author
    “Any formal attack on ignorance is bound to fail because the masses are always ready to defend their most precious possession – their ignorance.” – Hendrick Van Loon, Author
    “Men occasionally stumble over truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.” – Winston Churchill

On page 18 of his Concordant Commentary on the Book of Genesis, A. E. Knoch provides us with the following insightful tidbit:

    “God’s revelation is on a higher spiritual plane than other literature. Especially in prophecy, both past and future, God sometimes speaks of things as if they are being enacted BEFORE OUR EYES.” [Emphasis added]

God’s Word (Jesus) truly IS a LIVING WORD! So what does this mean for us today, in regards to the Genesis account? Simply this: the Genesis “fall of man” story is nothing more than a PARABLE! It never literally took place any more than the story of Lazarus and the rich man did. It is symbolic of an everyday present reality. There was no literal tree, there was no literal piece of fruit, and there was no literal flesh-and-blood serpent. So if we are not speaking of a literal event that took place some 6,000 years ago, then what do the symbols represent?

The tree of the knowledge of good and evil is the WORLD, which is “in the midst of the garden of God,” the focal point of God’s creation. And all that this world has to offer (the lust of the eyes, the lust of the flesh, and the pride of life) is its FRUIT! “Eden” is symbolic of our innocent, child-like condition. But as we mature and gain knowledge, we lose our innocence and are cast out of this garden paradise (our child-like fantasy world). Now we come to understand that we must learn to “till the ground” and earn our living “by the sweat of our brow,” because our parents aren’t always going to be there to provide for us. And later in life, when we come to understand our own mortality, we are seduced in our thinking (represented by the serpent) into believing the lie, that we shall not surely die. And this seducing spirit takes many forms, and continues to crawl upon its belly, feasting upon us, the DUST of the earth (Genesis 3:19; Ecclesiastes 3:20). And we continue to take refuge in these various forms of religious systems, or coverings (fig leaves), hiding from the truth. But the coverings that we attempt to provide for ourselves are but illusions, while God’s remedy is sure:

    “Also for Adam and his wife [and for ALL of humanity as well] the LORD God made tunics of skin, and clothed them.” (Genesis 3:21)

This verse is speaking of much more than God merely covering up physical, naked bodies. This verse is symbolic of much, much more – God’s plan of REDEMPTION! Although this passage doesn’t say what type of skin God used, I am quite certain that they were lamb skins: symbolic of the covering that our precious LAMB of God, the Lord Jesus Christ, has provided for us all.

THE MYSTERY OF INIQUITY

    “For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let [restrain], until he be taken out of the way.” (II Thessalonians 2:7)

Before continuing, please read II Thessalonians 2:1-12. Most Christian theologians and prophecy teachers are unanimous in their belief that this passage is speaking of end-time events. The “mystery of iniquity” is supposedly some sort of a satanic power that is to be unleashed during the Tribulation Period after the rapture of the church, which they say is the restraining force keeping the Antichrist (the wicked one, v. 8) at bay. And perhaps, at some point in the future, all of these things (except the rapture of the church, which is but another Christian myth) will take place. But it is my contention that this passage is primarily speaking, once again, of the fall of man. The parallels are too obvious to ignore.

The mystery of iniquity [wickedness] is none other than that “man of sin,” which lies dormant while we are babes. The restraining power that keeps us from recognizing it [our sinful nature] is our innocence, which we lose as we mature and gain knowledge. Our adolescent years are our most rebellious, and we are naturally inclined to disobey our parents and “do our own thing.” It is now that we begin to “oppose and exalt ourselves above all that is called God, sitting in the temple of God [we are the temple of God – I Corinthians 3:16; 6:19], believing that we are indeed gods” (v.4). And because of our pride, we are seduced into believing a lie (v.11), that we have control over our own destiny. But the control we believe we possess is but an illusion. And one Day, this lawless one will be clearly revealed (v.8) for all to see.

If you think I am just giving these verses my own private interpretations; that they are not grounded by any Scriptural support, then allow me to draw your attention to the following verse:

    “Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made.” (Genesis 3:1)

I will let New Wilson’s Old Testament Word Studies (p. 428) define the word subtil (subtle) as it is used here:

    “To be naked; to be crafty, cunning… It is observable that our first parents, before they sinned, are called (Genesis 2:25) naked, and the serpent in the very next verse is called subtil, BY ONE AND THE SAME WORD (Emphasis in CAPS are mine).

This provides further confirmation of what was already stated in Part Three, namely, that Adam and Eve’s cunning, sinful nature was already within them from their inception, even BEFORE they had sinned.

    “If anyone has an ear, let him hear.” (Revelation 13:9)

I pray that God is beginning to give you His spiritual ears to comprehend these spiritual truths. A chosen few WILL come to understand these things NOW; the vast majority will come to understand these things LATER, at the Great White Throne Judgment, where the “man of sin” is consumed (II Thessalonians 2:8), and the spirit of man is saved (I Corinthians 3:15).

    “Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand.” (Daniel 12:10)

Much more will be said on this subject (LORD willing) in Part Six of this series.

So, did a literal flesh-and-blood serpent seduce Adam and Eve into swallowing the equivalent of Hollywood’s “red pill” in the form of a literal piece of fruit, growing on a literal tree, in the midst of a literal lush garden paradise? Is this how they instantly gained a comprehensive understanding of good and evil? The more I think about it, the more ridiculous it becomes. This would not be consistent with what we see in the world today. And Scripture teaches us that God is consistent (Hebrews 13:8). Their understanding of good and evil, life and death, was knowledge they obtained as they matured, and came about as a result of their everyday life’s experiences. It was no different for them than it is for us today. So what were these experiences that opened their eyes to the truth of their own mortality? What do you think? Do you still believe the death of animals was something that was completely foreign to their experience?

Selah.

PART FIVE: DOES A “DAY” ALWAYS MEAN A LITERAL DAY?

Previous Post
Leave a comment

8 Comments

  1. Steve

     /  March 4, 2012

    If the Adam and Eve story is a parable it raises questions about certain ideas in certain verses. Three questions in particular: 1) Why does Romans 5 say that sin entered the world by “one man”? 2) Why does it say that not all men sinned after “the similitude of Adam’s transgression.”? 3) Why does 1 Cor. 15:22 say “As in Adam all died”? I can’t help but think that you’re theory is true simply because the idea of original sin is so troublesome. So I wrestled with the issue and came up with a possible explanation, although it doesn’t answer the objections completely. The idea of sin being passed down or transmitted was given to us in order to draw a stronger parallel between Adam and Christ. Adam is our representative in sin; Christ in righteousness. First the earthy, then the spiritual. First the living soul, then the life-giving spirit. He binds all in sin (in Adam) in order to have mercy on all (in Christ). That’s the best I could come up with, anyway. Having said that, it still seems odd that the bible would say the rest of us did not sin “after the similitude” of Adam if in fact that’s exactly what we all do. Please comment on these three questions. Thank you.

  2. Here’s what the Hebrew the word “adam” means:

    H120
    ‘âdâm
    aw-dawm’
    From H119; ruddy, that is, a human being
    (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.)
    http://studybible.info/strongs/H120

    1) I believe the phrase “one man” used in Rom 5:12 is symbolic of the entire species of man. So sin entered the world via man-KIND, not just the first man named “Adam.”

    2) In this case, Adam represents those who know God’s law and violate it. But even those who know NOT God’s law are still going to die. So in their case, ignorance is NOT bliss..

    3) Being “in Adam” simply means that we are all mortal and will one day die.

  3. Steve

     /  March 4, 2012

    Thanks for your usual quick and thorough reply. Concerning # 2) In other words, even those who sinned ignorantly–unlike Adam, who was given a direct command–still died. But that doesn’t accord with the idea of Adam and Eve being a parable. This still suggests a difference between Adam’s sin and everyone else’s, which is a distinction that would not be vailid if the Adam story is a parable. In other words, Adam sinned one way and everyone else sinned another. Why is God drawing a distinction that doesn’t apply?

    Unless of course (I have a habit of answering my own questions) God is treating the parabolic version of Adam as historical fact, applying it consistently throughout the bible. In other words, He’s not clarifying the fact that it was a parable when the opportunity presents itself, but rather keeping the parable up, even re-using it to make other points. Or to put it another way, this is His story and He’s sticking to it, treating it as fact–even if it’s just a parable. In other words, when a discussion of different types of sin arise, God uses Adam as an example of a different kind of sin–consistent with the parable–even though in reality his sin was the same as ours.

    Wow! What a brainbuster. That must be why it is so difficult–almost impossible–for people to understand it as a parable. You should do a post on this. I’ll probably have more questions on this issue–this is very difficult stuff.

    It’s also very important, though. That’s because the Universalist vs. Traditiionalist debate usually comes down to a bible boxing match which ends in a relative stalemate. Your approach–to destroy the myth of a perfect Adam and indeed even of original sin itself–undercuts the very foundation of eternal torment, namely the idea that man is–or was–somehow equal to God and infinitely accountable as opposed to being a fleshly creature that God created–is creating–to perfect over time and through suffering. In other words, you are trying to make sense out of nonsense. Peace.

  4. You’re getting pretty good at answering your own questions :)

    I think many of the Old and New Testament authors recorded things without fully understanding them. For instance, are we supposed to believe that John understood every vision he was shown while writing The Revelation of Jesus Christ? I seriously doubt it. So I don’t see why it would be any different when it comes to the fabled fall of man story either. The words they wrote down were definitely inspired (2 Pet 1:21), but that doesn’t necessarily mean they were fully understood. Even with the latter day increase in knowledge (Dan 12:4) we still are only able to see as through a glass dimly (1 Cor 13:12). Delving into God’s word is like peeling back the layers of an onion. As soon as we work our way through one layer another one presents itself. That’s the beauty of His word. It’s infinite, just as He is infinite.

  5. Steve

     /  March 19, 2012

    Just thought I would share an interesting quote with you–I think it goes a long way toward explaining why, if Adam and Eve was a parable, it was presented to us in the form we see it in the bible. Thomas Allin said: “Long familiarity has blinded us to the significance of the startling provision by which ADAM is linked organically with the whole race in the transmission of guilt. This tie is formed universally, and independently of any volition. To call Christ the second (i.e., last) ADAM is either to dupe men, or it is to assert a tie equally organic and absolute with the whole human race. But it is said, that, as men can shake off the heritage of ADAM, so they may the grace of Christ: I reply (I.) so they may, if the grace of Christ be only as strong as the sin of ADAM, which S. PAUL clearly denies, e.g., Rom. v. 15-21, &c. (II.) Before men can shake off a heritage they must have received it. Hence, unless Christ REPLACES THE RACE IN PARADISE, He has not undone the evil of the Fall (a fact which is steadily denied, or ignored, by the traditional creed), and so is not the second ADAM. (III.) It is an illogical process to say that because a partial failure took place (foreseen, and permitted for wise ends), therefore a new dispensation expressly designed to remedy that failure will itself fail. (IV.) In the highest and truest sense God never fails, never can fail.”

  6. Steve

     /  March 28, 2012

    Wanted to share a quote with you that further illustrates why God bound all sin in Adam. I added my own short comment at the end.

    We begin by quoting the Apostle Paul in his comment about the problem of creation in Romans 8:19-22,

    19 For the anxious longing of the creation waits eagerly for the revealing of the sons of God. 20 For the creation was subjected to futility, not of its own will, but because of Him who subjected it, in hope [expectation] 21 that the creation itself also will be set free from its slavery to corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth together until now.

    Paul makes it clear that the creation had no choice in being subjected to “futility” and to “slavery to corruption.” It was done by the sovereign will of God alone. Futility, vanity, or emptiness describe a path that appears to go nowhere and has no purpose. When Adam sinned, his sin was imputed to all mankind. We all became liable for Adam’s sin, and thus we are all mortal, paying for a sin which we did not commit. And not only mankind, but ALL OF CREATION was subjected to this “corruption.”

    It is contrary to the divine law for anyone to impute a father’s sin upon the children. Deuteronomy 24:16 says:

    16 Fathers shall not be put to death for their sons, nor shall sons be put to death for their fathers; everyone shall be put to death for his own sin.

    This Law is repeated in Ezekiel 18:20, which says:

    20 The person who sins will die. The son will not bear the punishment for the father’s iniquity, nor will the father bear the punishment for the son’s iniquity; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.

    Children were not to be punished for the sins of their father. And yet this is precisely what God did with us. The fact that all of Adam’s children are born mortal proves that we are paying for a sin committed by our father (Romans 5:12). Adam’s children were put to death for the sin of their father Adam. Did God not know that this was unjust? Of course He did! After all, He had prohibited such injustice by His own law, revealed to Moses and confirmed by Ezekiel.

    This raises the most basic question about the justice of God. Death was imposed upon us outside our will, and this is the root cause of all personal sins committed after Adam’s original sin. We are being held liable for a sin of our father, Adam. We cannot hide this issue and hope it goes unnoticed by God’s critics. Nor can we theologize it away after God clearly takes the credit for holding us liable.

    In dealing with this problem, we must first know that He is just, and have faith that He knows what He is doing. We must align ourselves with His plan, rather than attempt to alter His plan to fit what we think He should have done.

    In looking at the way God imputed Adam’s sin to his descendants, and the divine law which prohibits such behavior, we do not hesitate to call God’s action a “temporary injustice,” which is the direct cause of the Tension in the history of creation. Tension is the result of injustice or disharmony while it is yet unresolved. It has many applications. When a nation wrongs another, tension is set up, often leading to war. When an individual wrongs another, tension is in the air until restitution is made. Tension always demands a resolution.

    In music there are certain chords which contain conflicting or discordant notes. These chords set up an emotional tension until the chord is resolved. This is a very common musical technique, used to play upon the emotions of the listener and draw him into the music by forcing him psychologically to demand harmony. Discord torments the mind of the musician, in order to maximize the feeling of relief when the harmonious chord is struck and the tension resolved.

    It is much like the cliffhangers in books or television programs. All are temporary tensions designed to make the listeners demand a resolution.

    God, too, has employed this technique in the music of the spheres and in the book of history. Imputing death and corruption to mankind and to creation in general has produced a judicial tension that demands resolution. Paul says that God certainly will not leave creation hanging. The disharmony and injustice is only temporary. In fact, Paul says that the injustice that caused the tension will be MORE THAN COMPENSATED when the final chord of history is struck. And so Paul reminds us in Romans 8:18,

    18 For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that is to be revealed to us.

    And again, he says in 2 Corinthians 4:17,

    17 For momentary, light affliction is producing for us an eternal weight of glory far beyond all comparison,

    Paul is reminding us that the injustices of life are not only temporary, but will be more than righted at the last day when He restores all things.

    Justice and Liability for Evil

    The justice of God has been a matter of philosophical debate for thousands of years. In fact, all religions must deal with this question sooner or later. What is the origin of evil? What is its purpose? How will it end? Is there really justice with God? Some even question the existence of God on the grounds that “if there were really a God, why would He allow all these wars and other terrible things to happen?”

    Each religion’s solution to these age-old problems gives character to its own particular god. We have already raised questions about the justice of God of the Bible in view of the things He does by His own sovereign will, or plan. Recall that Paul, too, questioned God’s righteousness in dealing with Pharaoh (Rom. 9:14). Every time we talk about Esau, Pharaoh, or others who seem to have been treated unjustly, we raise the level of tension that must be resolved. And that is the purpose of this final section of our study.

    The real underlying question that we must deal with is the liability for sin. How liable is man for his sin? How liable is God for His actions in subjecting the creation to the bondage of corruption? God always assumes full responsibility for all of His actions, and, of course, man must follow His example.” End Quote

    Why did God bound all sin in ADAM? Especially when He later goes on in His LAW to say that we shouldn’t be punished for other people’s sin? And when, in all probability, it’s not really necessary–all would have sinned anyway, right? Isn’t that a fundamental church teaching on why it was okay for God to bind us up in Adam? We would have sinned the same as Adam if we were in his place? So why does God go out of his way to make it seem hereditary ? And then to go and put in His law that it’s wrong to impute sin from father to son? Because He’s putting Himself in violation of His own law, thereby obligating Himself to fix it. The injustice was done not to some, but to all; therefore God has bound Himself to save ALL.

  7. This article raises a very good question; one that I failed to address in my original article: Would God violate His own law by punishing the whole of mankind for some sin Adam and Eve supposedly committed? It doesn’t make a lick of sense. Which is yet another great reason why I must maintain that the garden story is nothing more than a parable: a fictitious account. Their horrendous “sin” was simply maturing to the point when they both came face to face with their own mortality – an understanding that they would one day die. One may ask, then why did God tell them NOT to partake of the fruit of the tree? The way the story is written appears as though they disobeyed a direct order. And I agree. Scripture usually IS written in such a way to conceal the true meaning from the carnal mind. We must always look to the Spirit behind the letter, because the letter itself (the literal meaning) kills (2 Cor 3:6).

    literal: 1.a) according with the letter of the scriptures (Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary)
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literal

    I liken God’s sentiment to that of a brand new parent. When children are first born into this world they are cute and adorable. And I’m sure there are parents who wish they could stay that way forever, for they know that they will no longer be able to hold onto them after they mature and begin to think for themselves. Which is precisely why God tells them NOT to “partake of the fruit” (mature) for He knows that there will along with the maturation process be growing pains. But at the same time God knows that this process (painful as it will be) must occur:

    Heb 12:11 “Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby.”

  1. A SURE FOUNDATION | Hell Fact or Fable

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>